Insights Blog

February 21st, 2020

Burger King’s Moldy Whopper Succeeded Miserably. Here’s Why:

Author

Ace Metrix

This is a safe space where we can all agree the Moldy Whopper doesn’t put us in the mood for Burger King…right now.

QSR ads thrive off of food-porn imagery that drives insatiable, instantaneous Desire. BK’s Moldy Whopper threw out that rule book. Seemingly crazy on the surface, but ad results indicate there was a different objective than immediate sales. Let us explain, starting with the obvious:

What Didn’t Work Well

Sanity check — “Moldy Whopper” did not induce instant cravings among gen pop viewers. A Desire score 36% below recent QSR advertising norms translated into weak positive purchase intent among viewers directly after watching. Additionally, 26% of viewers were turned off from purchasing (vs. only 6% for the category norm).

Ace Metrix Purchase Intent Chart: Burger King "Moldy Whopper"

No where is the Moldy Whopper’s repulsing effects more obvious than on Trace, which tracks viewer resonance with ad content on a second-by-second basis. Burger King builds positive interest in the first four seconds with the Whopper’s construction, which eventually trails off as viewers sit and wait unknowingly for the disgusting transformation.  

(This drop in engagement indicates vulnerability in skippable ad environments meaning some might not even make it to the moldy part — lucky them).

Unsurprisingly, there’s a staggering drop in resonance at the first sign of rot (19-seconds), with the line trailing into negative territory. A rare occurrence that very few ads generate when content is universally unappealing/a turn off. It’s likely what Burger King was going for, though:

Ace Metrix Trace Chart for Burger King's "Moldy Whopper"

This reaction is echoed in the overwhelmingly negative emotional connection viewers voiced:

Ace MEtrix emotional Profile for Burger King's "Moldy Whopper" ad

However, this adverse impact is also driving the success behind this ad…

What Worked Well

Shock value. Burger King created it with a combination of negative emotions, like Gross, Inappropriate and Incredulous. It’s a sure fire way to capture Attention and “Moldy Whopper” did just that at levels 10% above norm (when it was viewed in its entirety). 

With that much Attention, Burger King successfully communicated new Information which was the most favorable element for viewers. The “no preservatives” Message was named the top Single Best Thing about the ad (despite viewers having the option to choose “nothing about this ad”). 

The juxtaposition of repulsive visuals with agreeable information played out in the emotional impact on viewers, creating strong internal conflict among many (measured by our But metric in the Emo Profile above). Viewers acknowledged the gross, unappetizing visuals. However, most understood and appreciated the natural decaying effects and the product information it conveyed: 

“I’m unlikely to go to burger king as I do not often eat fast-food burgers, but knowing that Burger King is making an effort to only use fresh ingredients in their meals does make me think positively about the company. I might be willing to try Burger King if the opportunity arose.” Female 21-35

“This ad is very surprising, but it makes sense. I guess everything is a tradeoff, so no preservatives means you better eat it in due time. Of course, the burger is meant to be eaten right away, anyhow.” Female 36-49

“It seems like Burger King is moving in a new/healthier direction. The rotting burger was not appealing to me as a customer, but I liked the realness it involved. Also, the music went well with it.” Female 16-20

“It was pretty gross. I appreciate no artificial stuff but it is not an appetizing ad,” Male 21-35

“At first I thought the actual visuals themselves were very unappealing, but the message at the end about Whoppers not having artificial preservatives made the visuals more comforting.” Female 16-20

“The ad was honestly really gross. It did send a very important message about preservatives and it actually would influence me to choose them over others but the ad was gross.” Female 21-35

“Nasty it got my attention but was very gross I get the message but still seeing a whopper with mold very gross turn off” Male 36-49

Furthermore, the Message was so powerful that a handful of viewers (3%) made their own direct comparison to McDonald’s without Burger King doing so anywhere in the ad:

“It was about how the whopper doesn’t contain any artificial preservatives and does decay overtime unlike a mcdonalds burger.” Male 21-35

“its very interesting since we all know mcdonalds burgers don’t age” Female 21-35

“Wow, very eye-opening ad directed at McDonalds. I think this will be a good one.” Male 21-35

While it may seem like a mentally scarring image, the HD precision in “Moldy Whopper” will fade in memories overtime. Just take eye-witness accounts. This study from the National Academy of Sciences explains that “eyewitness misidentifications can be characterized as failures of visual perception or memory, the former being seeing things inaccurately, the latter being loss of accuracy or precision in the storage, maintenance, and recall of what was seen.” In other words, our visual memory isn’t as sharp as what we see in the moment.

The part that will make a lasting impression on consumers is the information conveyed. Based on its Attention and Information scores, as well as Strong But signal it’s clear most processed the Message. So, as long as Burger King doesn’t have images of moldy Whoppers near its storefronts this won’t hurt sales in the long run and is likely to help them.

AD TITLE

{{ title }}

BRAND

CATEGORY

{{ category }}

AIR DATE

{{ date }}

ACE SCORE

{{ rank }}

Scroll To Top